![]() ![]() ![]() The claim, as it wasn’t a directly argumentative paper, was hard to find. The subject isn’t the prisoner, but the hanging, just as the title suggests. He makes the argument subtle, and that is the style of writing he has the subtle use of words for description is what carries his narrative, not evidence. This makes it harder to see his argument and to analyze it as an argument, which seems to be what Orwell intended it to be, subtle. He argues his claim that capital punishment is wrong by presenting it as a narrative, not as an argumentative paper. Orwell presents all of these things but he does so not as clearly as to say it is an argument. The lack of detail but the descriptive words make it so the reader still thinks what Orwell intends for the reader to think while not attacking directly anything.Īn argument is composed of four parts: The subject, claims, evidence, and assumptions. He also has very specific word choice that makes the reader feel a certain way toward one thing or another. He does so by only focusing on the negative, by creating a mood that is very depressing, and creating character profiles modeling certain characters to seem either really bad or heartless, or really innocent. This piece of literature has many fallacies and has a stylized argument meant to persuade. He has a meager amount of details, all aimed toward showing how capital punishment is wrong. He does this by being very descriptive with tone and mood but not with actual details. Orwell delicately words this piece so that you feel and experience what Orwell was experiencing. “The Hanging” is a narrative of exactly that a hanging. George Orwell argues that Capital Punishment is wrong with a very weak argument using a narrative in “A Hanging”. Analysis of Orwell’s Argument against Capital Punishment | March 22, 2010 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |